GraphQL vs REST: choosing the right API architecture
The GraphQL vs REST debate continues, but the reality is nuanced. According to Postman's State of the API Report, GraphQL adoption grew 94% in 2024, yet REST remains dominant at 89% usage. Understanding when each approach excels is key to making the right architectural decision.
The API landscape
According to Apollo's State of GraphQL, companies using GraphQL report 30% faster frontend development and 40% reduction in over-fetching.
Core differences
GraphQL vs REST Comparison
| Feature | REST | GraphQL |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Queries | ✗ | ✓ |
| Strong Typing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Single Endpoint | ✗ | ✓ |
| Caching Simplicity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Learning Curve | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tooling Maturity | ✓ | ✓ |
It's Not Binary: Many successful organizations use both. REST for simple CRUD, GraphQL for complex data fetching. Choose based on use case, not ideology.
REST strengths
HTTP Semantics
Leverages HTTP methods, status codes, and caching natively. Well understood by all.
Simplicity
Easy to understand, implement, and debug. Lower learning curve for teams.
Caching
HTTP caching works out of the box. CDNs, browsers, proxies all understand it.
Wide Adoption
Universal support, extensive tooling, large talent pool.
GET /users
Retrieve collection
GET /users/:id
Retrieve single resource
POST /users
Create resource
PUT /users/:id
Update resource
DELETE /users/:id
Remove resource
GraphQL strengths
Query Flexibility
Clients request exactly the data they need. No over-fetching or under-fetching.
Strong Typing
Schema defines types, enables tooling, documentation, and validation.
Single Request
Fetch related data in one request instead of multiple round trips.
Evolution
Add fields without versioning. Deprecate gracefully.
GraphQL Benefits: Typical Improvement (%)
When to choose REST
Best Use Cases for REST
When to choose GraphQL
Best Use Cases for GraphQL
GraphQL challenges
Caching Complexity
HTTP caching doesn't work as easily. Need client-side normalization or persisted queries.
N+1 Problem
Naive resolvers can cause database query explosion. Need DataLoader pattern.
Security
Query complexity attacks, deep nesting. Need query cost analysis and limits.
Learning Curve
New paradigm for teams used to REST. Schema design requires skill.
Performance Pitfalls: GraphQL's flexibility can hide performance issues. A single query can trigger hundreds of database calls. Always implement query cost analysis and monitoring.
Schema design best practices
Domain Modeling
Design schema around business domain, not database tables
Pagination
Use cursor-based pagination for all lists
Nullability
Be intentional about nullable fields
Naming
Consistent naming conventions across schema
Mutations
Return affected objects, use input types
Errors
Use union types for expected error states
REST best practices
Resource Naming
Nouns not verbs, plural for collections
HTTP Methods
Use GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE correctly
Status Codes
Return appropriate HTTP status codes
Versioning
URL or header versioning strategy
HATEOAS
Include links for navigation
Error Format
Consistent error response structure
Migration strategies
GraphQL Gateway
Add GraphQL layer over existing REST APIs. Low risk, gradual migration.
New Features in GraphQL
Build new functionality in GraphQL, maintain REST for existing.
Strangler Pattern
Gradually replace REST endpoints with GraphQL resolvers.
Big Bang
Replace REST entirely. High risk, only for greenfield or major rewrites.
Performance comparison
Response Time by Query Complexity
Tooling ecosystem
API Tooling Comparison
| Feature | REST | GraphQL |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Code Generation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Testing Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| IDE Support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gateway Options | ✓ | ✓ |
FAQ
Q: Should we use GraphQL for our next project? A: Consider GraphQL if you have: complex data requirements, multiple client types (web, mobile), need for rapid frontend iteration. Stick with REST for simple CRUD, public APIs, or when caching is critical.
Q: Can we use both REST and GraphQL? A: Yes—many organizations do. Use REST for simple resources and integrations, GraphQL for complex frontend data needs. A GraphQL gateway can even wrap existing REST APIs.
Q: What about gRPC? A: gRPC excels for internal service-to-service communication with its binary protocol and streaming. Consider: REST for public APIs, GraphQL for frontend, gRPC for microservices.
Q: How do we handle file uploads in GraphQL? A: GraphQL isn't ideal for file uploads. Common approaches: separate REST endpoint for uploads, multipart request extensions, or pre-signed URLs with mutations.
Sources and further reading
- Postman State of the API Report
- Apollo GraphQL Best Practices
- GraphQL Specification
- REST API Design Rulebook
- Production Ready GraphQL
Design Better APIs: Choosing the right API architecture requires understanding your specific use cases and constraints. Our team helps organizations design and implement APIs that serve their needs. Contact us to discuss your API strategy.
Need help with API design? Connect with our architects to develop a tailored API strategy.
